| dc.contributor.author |
Bińczyk, Ewa |
| dc.date.accessioned |
2013-11-15T10:05:59Z |
| dc.date.available |
2013-11-15T10:05:59Z |
| dc.date.issued |
2011 |
| dc.identifier.citation |
„Teksty Drugie”, 2011, nr 4, s. 69-85. |
| dc.identifier.issn |
0867-0633 |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://repozytorium.umk.pl/handle/item/995 |
| dc.description.abstract |
The article discusses and comments on two feminist, philosophical standpoints: Judith
Butler's radical postfeminism and Rosi Braidotti's nomadic philosophy of the embodied
subject. The author poses two main questions: (i) In what way a consistent, anti-essentialist vision of the subject can be built? (ii) What kind of political hints or postulates can be drawn from both said conceptions? Consequently, advantages and disadvantages of both philosophical approaches are presented. |
| dc.language.iso |
pol |
| dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.subject |
feminizm |
| dc.subject |
antyesencjalizm |
| dc.subject |
Judith Butler |
| dc.subject |
Rosi Braidotti |
| dc.subject |
postfeminizm |
| dc.subject |
nomadyzm |
| dc.title |
Uniesienia i potknięcia filozofii podmiotu. Projektowanie stanowisk feministycznych poza założeniami esencjalizmu. |
| dc.title.alternative |
Ups and downs of the philosophy of the subject. Designing feminist standpoints beyond the assumptions of essentialism |
| dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
