dc.contributor.author |
Gładziejewski, Paweł |
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-11-06T09:08:52Z |
dc.date.available |
2018-11-06T09:08:52Z |
dc.date.issued |
2015 |
dc.identifier.citation |
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric vol. 40 (53), 2015, pp. 63 - 90 |
dc.identifier.isbn |
978-83-7431-440-4 |
dc.identifier.issn |
0860-150X |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repozytorium.umk.pl/handle/item/5460 |
dc.description.abstract |
Despite the fact that the notion of internal representation has – at
least according to some – a fundamental role to play in the sciences of the mind,
not only has its explanatory utility been under attack for a while now, but it
also remains unclear what criteria should an explanation of a given cognitive
phenomenon meet to count as a (truly, genuinely, nontrivially, etc.) represen-
tational explanation in the first place. The aim of this article is to propose
a solution to this latter problem. I will assume that representational explanations
should be construed as a form of mechanistic explanations and proceed by
proposing a general sketch of a functional architecture of a representational cognitive mechanism. According to the view on offer here, representational mechanisms are mechanisms that meet four conditions: the structural resemblance
condition, the action-guidance condition, the decouplability condition, and the
error-detection condition. |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.subject |
mechanistic explanation |
dc.subject |
representationalism |
dc.subject |
antirepresentationalism |
dc.subject |
emulation theory |
dc.subject |
predictive coding |
dc.subject |
structural representation |
dc.title |
Explaining mental phenomena with internal representations. A mechanistic perspective |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |