dc.contributor.author |
Bińczyk, Ewa |
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-11-13T08:51:35Z |
dc.date.available |
2013-11-13T08:51:35Z |
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
dc.identifier.citation |
„Avant”, Vol. IV, 2013, nr 1, 317-338, DOI: 10.12849/40102013.0106.0018 |
dc.identifier.issn |
2082 - 6710 |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repozytorium.umk.pl/handle/item/945 |
dc.description |
Zmodyfikowane tłumaczenie tekstu (Post)konstruktywizm na temat technonauki, „Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa”, 2010, nr 2, 231-251, przeł. Monika Włudzik. |
dc.description.abstract |
The main aims of the article are as follows: (1) to indicate that cognition (in
particular the conditions of effectiveness in laboratory practices) may be satisfactorily
modelled from a (properly determined) constructivist perspective;
(2) to reconstruct the latest tendencies within science and technology studies
encapsulated in the term (post)constructivism rather than in the notion of
social constructivism; (3) to show how technoscience is conceptualised from
the (post)constructivist standpoint. |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.subject |
science and technology studies |
dc.subject |
sociology of scientific knowledge |
dc.subject |
constructivism |
dc.subject |
(post)constructivism |
dc.subject |
laboratory practice |
dc.subject |
technoscience |
dc.title |
(Post)constructivism on Technoscience |
dc.title.alternative |
(Post)konstruktywizm na temat technonauki |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |