Knowledge Argument versus Bundle Theory according to Derek Parfit
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
According to constitutive reductionism of Derek Parfit, a subject/person is not a separate existing being but his existence consists in the existence of a brain and body, performance of actions, thinking and occurrence of other physical and mental events. The identity of the subject in time comes down only to “Relation R” - mental consistency and/or connectedness – elicited by appropriate reasons. In the following article, I will try, relying on Frank Johnson's Knowledge Argument, to argue in favour of the following conclusions: (1) a person/subject is a “fact”irreducible to body and physical relations with the environment and (2) a subject is something/”fact” non-reducible to mental occurrences.
Description
Keywords
subject, person, identity, qualia, consciousness, self-consciousness
Citation
Scientia et Fides, No. 2, Vol. 5, pp. 237-250
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Poland