Glosa krytyczna do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 24 maja 2019 r., I CSK 218/18

dc.contributor.authorŚwiątczak, Krzysztof
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-23T02:37:26Z
dc.date.available2023-05-23T02:37:26Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-24
dc.description.abstractThe Supreme Court in its judgment of 24 May 2019, I CSK 218/18, ruled that the purpose of increase in a lump sum remuneration under Article 632 § 2 of the Polish Civil Code is only to reduce the loss. The purpose of increasing the lump sum remuneration is not to compensate for the entire imminent loss. Such increase should cover that part of the loss which exceeds the normal contractual risk. The aim of this paper is to comment on the above judgment of the Supreme Court. The author compares the Supreme Court judgment with the views of legal scholars and commentators on the Polish judicial law, and with the previous case law.pl
dc.identifier.citationStudia Iuridica, 2022, nr 94, s. 378-390pl
dc.identifier.issn0137-4346
dc.identifier.issn2544-3135
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.31338/2544-3135.si.2022-94.22
dc.identifier.urihttp://repozytorium.umk.pl/handle/item/6859
dc.language.isopolpl
dc.publisherWydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiegopl
dc.subjectumowa o roboty budowlanepl
dc.subjectwynagrodzenie ryczałtowepl
dc.subjectstratapl
dc.subjectcontract for construction workpl
dc.subjectlump sum remunerationpl
dc.subjectlosspl
dc.titleGlosa krytyczna do wyroku Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 24 maja 2019 r., I CSK 218/18pl
dc.title.alternativeA commentary on the Supreme Court judgment of 24 may 2019 (I CSK 218/18)pl
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepl

Files

Original bundle

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
SI_2022_94.pdf
Size:
312.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.34 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:

Collections