SOCJOLOGIA WIEDZY JAKO MOŻLIWY PARADYGMAT DLA TEORII ETNICZNOŚCI
dc.contributor.author | Abriszewski, Krzysztof | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-11-15T10:49:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-11-15T10:49:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1998 | |
dc.description.abstract | Sociology of knowledge does not enjoy, as a matter of fact, any good opinion. Sociologists are discouraged and annoyed by its associations with philosophy, whereas philosophers blame it for "empiricism" and "discarding" character. That is why it may seem not to be a suitable theoretical instrument for the study of the ethnicity. My thesis, which I try to plead here is, that sociology of knowledge may be quite useful in those studies. I am going support it by the following arguments: 1. Theoretical pluralism requires a broad and differential knowledge; 2. Sociology of knowledge seems to be useful when there are difficulties in penetrating a group from inside; 3. Sociology of knowledge is a suitable method for historical research on groups for which only documents (in a broad sense) are left. The paradigm presented here and the type of analysis connected with it would be liminted to the study of discourse. That is why I am suggesting to refer to two traditions: the continuation of the theory of Karl Mannheim and to structuralism (and post-structuralism). The concept central to the paradigm which is at ще same time the central concept for the theory of ethnicity is the notion of the Alien. Axiomatic are then the theories of the Alien created by Georg Simmel and Zygmunt Bauman, which include the statements concerning self-confirmation and self- -abrogation of the strangeness. The main motifs distinguished in the discussed discourse (without any claims for the list to be full) are: defining and protecting of the group's social boundaries, its relations with the dominating group, identity both referring to the individual and the group, history, mythical narratives, the role of cultural heroes, rhetorics of food. Other things that should be taked into consideration are: similarity of the studied text to other texts constructed beyond the group, convergence of their concepts and aesthetics as well as the "types of truth, i.e. reliability of the text". | pl |
dc.identifier.citation | „Etnografia Polska", t. ХЫ1: 1998, z. 1-2, s. 41-50. | pl |
dc.identifier.issn | 0071-1861 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repozytorium.umk.pl/handle/item/1012 | |
dc.language.iso | pol | pl |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.subject | socjologia wiedzy | pl |
dc.subject | teoria etniczności | pl |
dc.title | SOCJOLOGIA WIEDZY JAKO MOŻLIWY PARADYGMAT DLA TEORII ETNICZNOŚCI | pl |
dc.title.alternative | S O C I O L O G Y O F K N O W L E D G E - A POSSIBLE PARADIGM FOR T H E T H E O R Y O F E T H N I C I TY | pl |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | pl |
Files
Original bundle
Loading...
- Name:
- K. Abriszewski, Socjologia wiedzy jako możliwy paradygmat dla teorii etniczności.pdf
- Size:
- 778.58 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.34 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: