Glosa częściowo krytyczna do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 17 marca 2017 r. (III CZP 110/16)

dc.contributor.author	Świątczak, Krzysztof
dc.date.accessioned	2022-05-14T12:17:11Z
dc.date.available	2022-05-14T12:17:11Z
dc.date.issued	2022-05-02
dc.description.abstract	The Supreme Court in the judgment of 17 March 2017, Ref. No. III CZP 110/16, ruled that it is permissible to enter into an agreement to renounce a legal portion in Polish civil law. Until now, it was unacceptable. The Supreme Court ruled that since the inheritance can be renounced, all the more so a legal portion can be renounced. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the above resolution of the Supreme Court. The author intends to compare the judgment of the Supreme Court with the views of the representatives of the doctrine of Polish judicial law and the previous case-law.	pl
dc.identifier.citation	Studia Iuridica UW, Tom 89, 2022, pp. 332-344.	pl
dc.identifier.issn	0137-4346
dc.identifier.uri	http://repozytorium.umk.pl/handle/item/6741
dc.language.iso	pol	pl
dc.subject	zachowek	pl
dc.subject	umowa	pl
dc.subject	spadek	pl
dc.subject	legal portion	pl
dc.subject	agreement	pl
dc.subject	inheritance	pl
dc.title	Glosa częściowo krytyczna do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 17 marca 2017 r. (III CZP 110/16)	pl
dc.title.alternative	A commentary of a commentary on The Supreme Court's Judgment of 17 March 2017 (Ref. No. III CZP 110/16)	pl
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article	pl

Files

Name:: Glosa częściowo krytyczna do uchwały Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 17 marca 2017 r., sygn. III CZP 110-16.pdf
Size:: 298.05 KB
Format:: Adobe Portable Document Format