Abstrakt:
The present study, using semiotic method, is an attempt to present the image
of Venice in Pribavleniya k “Rimskim pis’mam” (1847) by Andrey Muravyov
as a space experienced, felt, and also written down and thus preserved. The
author seeks to demonstrate that, in his refl ections, the Russian writer adopted
the Orthodox perspective, pointing to the presence of the Byzantine heritage
in Venice and emphasizing that Venice in a way exploited Constantinople.
Although Muravyov thoroughly described the most characteristic places of
the “pearl of the Adriatic,” as Venice was then called, simultaneously studying
its peculiarities, he looked at them with the eye of a pilgrim rather than that of
a tourist. The presentation of Muravyov’s image of Venice incorporates a specifi
c ‘dictionary’ which can be reconstructed based on his works. The analyses
are based on the semiotic theory put forward by Vladimir Toporov and on the
concept of the city’s signature symbols, as proposed by Tat’yana Tsiv’yan. Muravyov’s
descriptions of the characteristics of Venice are considered in relation
to, respectively, the city’s landscape, its culture and symbols, and the stylistic
devices he used.