Antropologizacja literaturoznawstwa a komparatystyka

Repository of Nicolaus Copernicus University

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kola, Adam F.
dc.date.accessioned 2013-04-12T09:33:46Z
dc.date.available 2013-04-12T09:33:46Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.citation Antropologizowanie humanistyki. Zjawisko – procesy – perspektywy, red. J. Kowalewski, W. Piasek, Olsztyn: Colloquia Humaniorum 2009, s. 83-106
dc.identifier.isbn 978-83-60636-08-4
dc.identifier.uri http://repozytorium.umk.pl/handle/item/483
dc.description.abstract The aim of the paper is comparison of the process of development of cultural anthropology and comparative studies in the perspective of post-war anthropologization of whole humanities and social science. It ought to be emphasized, that this proposition is different from Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek or Michael Riffaterre’s complementarity of comparative literature and cultural studies, cultural theory or cultural critique. Afterward I underline some of the key issues of cultural anthropology, and their application into the comparative literature. Among the others, I analyzed in this article three of them: (1) Practice shows that intercultural communication is possible and effective. In philosophy I would defend the idea of “internal realism” or “pragmatic realism”, or – in different terms – “intentional rationality” (Michał Buchowski). In this approach people act in accordance with the norms, and convictions, beliefs shared in their community (like in Jerzy Kmita’definition of culture). Ergo: all cultures are rational in their own perspective. Based on this issue we could rethink the idea of intercultural translation (borrowed from Stanley Tambiah and supported by Hilary Putnam), and combine those topics with the paradigm central for current comparative literature. (2) Moreover, in this article I presented transformation from Goethe’s idea of ‘Weltliterature’ to David Damrosch’s world literature and the consequences of that process from the perspective of anthropologization of comparative studies. (3) Finally, I combine this approaches with globalization in the gaze of cultural anthropology (especially questions of relativism, multiculturalism, acculturation, intercultural exchange, etc.), and the possible (not only academic but also social) role of comparative literature in (post)modern world.
dc.language.iso pol
dc.publisher Instytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego
dc.relation.ispartofseries Colloquia Humaniorum;
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subject Literaturoznawstwo
dc.subject Antropologizacja humanistyki
dc.subject Antropologia kulturowa i społeczna
dc.subject Tłumaczenie
dc.subject Racjonalność intencjonalna
dc.subject Komparatystyka
dc.subject Antropologizacja literaturoznawstwa
dc.subject Kulturoznawstwo
dc.subject Kulturowa teoria literatury
dc.subject Przekład międzykulturowy
dc.subject Literatura światowa
dc.subject Weltliteratur
dc.subject World Literature
dc.subject Globalizacja
dc.title Antropologizacja literaturoznawstwa a komparatystyka
dc.title.alternative “Antropologization of the Literary Studies and Comparative Studies”
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search repository

Advanced Search


My Account