dc.contributor.author |
Pięta, Piotr |
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-04-19T12:33:58Z |
dc.date.available |
2017-04-19T12:33:58Z |
dc.date.issued |
2017-01-24 |
dc.identifier.citation |
Societas et Ius, No. 4, pp. 99-110 |
dc.identifier.issn |
23001658 |
dc.identifier.other |
doi:10.12775/SEI.2015.007 |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://repozytorium.umk.pl/handle/item/4196 |
dc.description.abstract |
In this paper author analyzes two different conceptions of management in London. Over the years this model has constantly evolved with the change of the ruling party. London is one of the biggest european metropolitan area therefore is a kind of source of innovation and role model for other mertopolis. The main aim of this article is to analyze and compare both of approaches to metropolitan areas management in London and indication main effects and consequences of their functioning. |
dc.language.iso |
pol |
dc.rights |
Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Poland |
dc.rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/pl/ |
dc.title |
Koncepcje zarządzania Londynem w reformach Konserwatystów i Labourzystów |
dc.type |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |