Abstrakt:
Theories which are the base of this article refers to institutional project. Among democratic instruments we can mark out inter alia political institutions. But to find out more about mentioned aspects, It is necessary to examine and analyze fields, methods and ways of thinking about them. This particular dilemma is one of many which we can read about in famous book of James March and Johan Olsen “Rediscovering Iinstitutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics”. At the beginning it’s important to remind that the principle idea of theory of sovereignty is based on the fact that the people will should finally overweight. Thought, it is important to answer actual questions like who adhere to “the people”, how it’s possible to recognize their “will”, how long does “finally” take and what exactly “overweight” means. Theories distincts in this matters. But it is crucial to straight out that those slim differences are very important, because their interpretation transfer to distinction of two opposite political processes called by their authors aggregated and integrated ones. Moreover, making short simplification, the same distinction is combined with well known contrast between contractual and collective view on social organization which grew on dissimilarities between societies defined as collectivistic and individualistic ones. This article inspired by “Rediscovering Iinstitutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics” book refers to proposition of dividing political processes into aggregated and integrated ones. After broad explanation March’s and Olsen’s theories, the author compare them to other conceptions like contractual and collective ones trying to find common bounds same as main fields of disagreement of mentioned theories
